After the market declined by $80 billion, China altered the regulations in the video game sector, easing them
In China, 105 video games from local publishers, including projects by Tencent Holdings Ltd. and NetEase Inc., have been approved. Bloomberg reported this development.
The Chinese government took this step after the country's regulatory body recently introduced new rules limiting expenditures and rewards that incentivize players in video games. According to the new regulations, gamers cannot be rewarded for daily logins, initial expenditures, or consecutive spending.
These new rules immediately impacted the country's video game industry. Tencent Holdings' shares dropped by 16%, while NetEase's fell by 25%. As a result, the industry suffered an immediate loss of $80 billion in market value.
As a response, the Chinese regulator listened to all sides to improve the rules. The approval of 105 video games in China is seen as a sign that the government has decided to soften its stance regarding the new regulations.
Free gems, plus daily, weekly, & monthly boosts!
3 FREE Cases & 5% Deposit Bonus
15% Deposit bonus + Free case!
EXTRA 10% DEPOSIT BONUS + free 2 spins
3 Free Cases + 100% up to 100 Coins on First Deposit
Sign up now and get 2 FREE CASES + 5$ Bonus
Get 5% bonus and 5 FREE Cases Using Code: EGAMERSW
5% deposit bonus up to 100 gems
BEST ODDS, free daily case, free rains, daily, weekly and monthly rakeback!
EGW – get 30% Deposit Bonus
5 Free Cases, Daily FREE & Welcome Bonuses up to 35%
5 FREE Cases & 5% Deposit Bonus with code: EGAMERSW
Sign up and get a FREE Gift Case, Bonus Cases, Daily Coins, and Rakeback Rain!
Free daily case + 5% deposit bonus
EGAMERSW - get 11% Deposit Bonus + Bonus Wheel free spin
Code "EGW" for 8% bonus. Daily Free Cases. Hourly in-site giveaways
a free Gift Case
Up to 4% Rakeback Bonus
3 free cases and a 5% bonus added to all cash deposits.
Get 5% bonus on your deposit
10% TOP UP BONUS + $0.50
+100% bonus on first deposit.
+5% to deposit
2% Deposit Bonus
Free Case and Deposit Bonus
Comments